Election Insecurity in Social Media Campaigns: An Analysis of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election

Authors

  • Muh Khamdan Central Java Branch of the Education and Training Center for Law, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Nadiah Abidin Mass Communication, School of Media Arts and Studies, Ohio University, United States of America
  • Wiharyani Law Human Resources Development Agency, Ministry of Law, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35719/fenomena.v24i1.204

Keywords:

social media, contestation,, politics, mobilization, conflict, media sosial, kontestasi, politik, mobilisasi, konflik

Abstract

This article examines changes in campaign patterns and the mobilization of political support through online media. This shift in campaign strategy provides competing political groups with opportunities to innovate in their use of digital media tools. Political contestation necessitates access to alternative information sources beyond mainstream media. However, social media, which allows individuals to autonomously convey political views and calls to action, carries the risk of political vulnerability through hate speech and misinformation. This paper employs a qualitative method, analyzing data through content analysis based on Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis model, which emphasizes textual, practical, and socio-cultural dimensions. The primary sources for this article are documents concerning evolving patterns of presidential election contestation in online media and activities interpreting political contestation. Socio-cultural analysis reveals that the voting public in the presidential election tends to acquire knowledge of diversity through social media rather than direct mobilization, potentially contributing to increased tensions in Indonesia’s political contestation.

Artikel ini menggambarkan perubahan pola kampanye dan mobilisasi dukungan politik di melalui media online. Perubahan strategi kampanye tersebut memberikan peluang bagi kelompok-kelompok politik yang berkontestasi untuk lebih kreatif memanfaatkan instrumen media. Kontestasi politik sangat membutuhkan ketersediaan alternatif sumber-sumber informasi di luar media mainstream. Persoalannya, pemanfaatan media sosial yang sangat otonom bagi individu untuk menyampaikan pandangan dan ajakan politik, memiliki potensi kerawanan politik akibat adanya ujaran kebencian dan pelintiran kebenaran. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode kualitatif yang menjelaskan data dengan metode analisis isi menggunakan teori critical discourse analysis model Norman Fairclough, yang menitikberatkan pada analisis teks, praktik, dan sosial kultural. Sumber utama artikel ini adalah dokumen-dokumen terkait pergeseran pola kontestasi pemilihan presiden di media online dan aktivitas interpretasi kontestasi politik. Hasil analisis sosiokultural menjelaskan bahwa situasi masyarakat pemilih dalam pemilihan presiden memiliki kecenderungan mengambil pengetahuan keberagaman melalui media sosial daripada mobilisasi langsung, sehingga berpotensi memunculkan konflik dalam kontestasi politik di Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aminulloh, Akhirul., et.al. .(2025). Political Gimmicks on Social Media in the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election. The Journal of Society and Media. 9(1). 74–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v9n1.p74-96

Arianto B. 2014. Fenomena Relawan Politik dalam Kontestasi Presidensial 2014. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP). 18(2).

Bawaslu. 2023. Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu dan Pemilihan Serentak 2024. Jakarta: Bawaslu Republik Indonesia

Brendan O. (2015). Identity Politics has Created an Army of Vicious. Narcissistic Cowards. The Spectator.

Bungin B. 2005. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif, Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis Ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dahl, R. 1971. Polyarchy Participation and Opposition. London: Yale University Press.

Dharma, Ferry Adhi. et.all (2023). Construction of Political Identity on Instagram: Unveiling the Kadrun Hashtag Movement in Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential Election. Academia Open. 8(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.6922

Downs A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy. 65(2).

Durmaz, Zekeriya & Yogun, Mehmet Salih. (2022). A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Visual Image in Norman Fairclough’s CDA Model. International Journal of Scholars in Education. 5(1), 25-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1101763

Goffman, Erving. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh

Goffman, Erving. 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York, Touchstone Book.

Habermas J. 2010. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana

Higashikata, Takayuki & Kawamura, Koichi. (2015). Voting Behavior in Indonesia from 1999 to 2014: Religious Cleavage or Economic Performance?. IDE Discussion Paper. Nomor 512. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2620455

Hu, L. (2024). Mobilization, self-expression or argument? A computational method for identifying language styles in political discussion on Twitter. Online Information Review, 48(4), 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2022-0545

Intyaswati D, Fairuzza M. 2023. The Influence of Social Media on Online Political Participation among College Students: Mediation of Political Talks. Southern Communication Journal. 88 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2165703

Khamdan, Muh & Wiharyani. (2018). Mobilisasi Politik Identitas dan Kontestasi Gerakan Fundamentalisme. Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam. 18(1), 193-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v18i1.1198

Khamdan, Muh, et.al. (2024). Pancasila Values and Peace Verses as Resilience Against the Religious Extremism: Study on Nahdlatul Ulama and Shi’a. Progresiva : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam. 13(02). 181–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v13i02.32778

Khamdan, Muh. (2022). Politik Identitas dan Perebutan Hegemoni Kuasa: Kontestasi dalam Politik Elektoral di Indonesia. Serang: Penerbit A-Empat.

Khamdan, Muh. et.al. (2024). Ideological Contestations of Salafism and Moderatism in Indonesia's Hijra Movement: Critical Discourse Analysis. Al’Adalah. 27(2), 101-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35719/aladalah.v27i2.531

Khamdan, Muh. et.al. (2024). National Islam in the Contestation of Ideology and Politics in Indonesia. Ulul Albab. 25(2), 179-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v25i2.26951

Klandermans B, Staggenborg S. 2002. Methods of Social Movement Research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

Kosim, M., Muqoddam, F., Mubarok, F., & Laila, N. Q. (2023). The dynamics of Islamic education policies in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172930

Lim, M. 2012. The League of Thirteen Media Concentration in Indonesia. Arizona: Arizona State University.

Mahoney L, Tang T. 2024. Strategic Social Media from Marketing to Social Change. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons

Muhtadi, Burhanuddin. 2019. Populisme Politik Identitas dan Dinamika Elektoral: Mengurai Jalan Panjang Demokrasi Prosedural. Malang: Intrans.

Muhtadi, Burhanuddin. 2020. Kuasa Uang, Politik Uang dalam Pemilu Pasca-Orde Baru. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Mujani, Saiful, et.al. 2012. Kuasa Rakyat: Analisis tentang Perilaku Memilih dalam Pemilihan Legislatif dan Presiden Indonesia Pasca-Orde Baru. Jakarta: Mizan Publika.

Pajares, D. P. (2023). Between Spanish Language and Multilingualism in Spain: The Radical Right Placement. Journal of Nationalism Memory and Language Politics , 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/jnmlp-2023-0002

Rush M & Althoft P. (2008). Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Santoso, Didik Haryadi, et.al (2024). Combating The Disinformation: Verifiying The Fact of Political Hoaxes in Election-2024 in Indonesia. Profetik Jurnal Komunikasi. 17 (2), 369-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v17i2.3003

Scott, James. 2000. Senjatanya Orang-orang yang Kalah. Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. Power in Movement; Social Movement and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Utomo W. 2013. Menimbang Media Sosial dalam Marketing Politik di Indonesia: Belajar dari Jokowi-Ahok di Pilkada DKI Jakarta 2012. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP). 17(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10894

Vasist P, Chatterjee D, Krishnan S. (2024). The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative. Information System Frontiers. 26. 668-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10390-w

Vicente, P. 2013. Is Vote Buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa. The Economic Journal. 124(574). 356-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12086

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Khamdan, M., Abidin, N., & Wiharyani. (2025). Election Insecurity in Social Media Campaigns: An Analysis of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election. Fenomena, 24(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.35719/fenomena.v24i1.204