Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Dosen pada Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Jember
Factors Influencing Lecturer Performance at the State Islamic College of Jember
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/fenomena.v3i2.348Keywords:
Lecturer Performance, Work Experience, Education and Training, Kinerja Dosen, Pengalaman Kerja, Pendidikan dan PelatihanAbstract
The productivity of teaching staff determines the quality of higher education institutional outcomes, yet lecturer performance is often influenced by factors that have not been comprehensively mapped. Grounded in human resource management theory emphasizing motivation, ability, and work environment, this study examines the effects of education and training, work experience, rewards, and control on lecturer performance. A census of 60 lecturers at STAIN Jember was conducted, and data were analyzed using multiple linear regression in SPSS 10.00. The findings show that, together, the four independent variables account for 64.00% of the variance in lecturer performance, with work experience the most dominant factor (19.70%), followed by rewards (15.35%), education and training (9.70%), and control (4.73%). This study concludes that improving lecturer performance requires balanced attention to all four factors, particularly by leveraging experienced lecturers to mentor newer colleagues. It is recommended that university leaders expand access to training, establish non-financial reward systems, and foster a culture of continuous supervisor-subordinate guidance.
Produktivitas tenaga pendidik menentukan kualitas capaian organisasi pendidikan tinggi, namun kinerja dosen seringkali dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor yang belum terpetakan secara komprehensif. Berlandaskan teori manajemen sumber daya manusia yang menekankan peran motivasi, kemampuan, dan lingkungan kerja, penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh pendidikan dan pelatihan, pengalaman kerja, penghargaan, serta kontrol terhadap kinerja dosen. Metode yang digunakan adalah sensus terhadap 60 dosen STAIN Jember dengan analisis regresi linier berganda melalui SPSS 10.00. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan keempat variabel bebas memberikan pengaruh sebesar 64,00% terhadap kinerja dosen, dengan pengalaman kerja menjadi faktor paling dominan (19,70%), diikuti penghargaan (15,35%), pendidikan dan pelatihan (9,70%), serta kontrol (4,73%). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa peningkatan kinerja dosen memerlukan perhatian berimbang pada keempat faktor tersebut, terutama pendayagunaan dosen berpengalaman untuk membina rekan sejawat yang lebih baru. Direkomendasikan agar pimpinan perguruan tinggi memperluas akses pelatihan, membangun sistem penghargaan non-finansial, serta membudayakan pembinaan atasan terhadap bawahan secara berkelanjutan.
Downloads
References
Bernard and Russel, 1993, Human Resource Management, Mc Graw Hill, Inc, Singapore.
Cascio, W. dan E. Valenzi, 1989, Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales: Effects of Education and Job Experience of Raters and Ratees, Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol.62.No.3.
Davis, K. Wertner, 1996, Human Behaviour At Work: Organizational Behaviour, Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill Publishing Ltd, New Delhi.
Dharma, A., 1996, Gaya Kepemimpinan Yang Efektif Bagi Manajer, Sinar Baru Bandung.
Douglas Mc. Gregor, 1978, Effects of Instruction to Avoid Halo Error in Reliability and Validity of Performance Evaluation Ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol.65.
Dresler, Garry, 1995, Organization Theory, Reston Publishing Company Inc.
Gibson, J.L., and John M. Ivencevich and James H, Donnely, Jr, 1996, Organization, Sixth Edition, Terjemahan: Djakarsih dan Agus Dharma, Penerbit Erlangga Jakarta.
Harbison and Mejers, 1964, Appraisal Everyone Can Agree On, dari Management World, The Administrative Management Society.
Keputusan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 13/Menpan/98 tentang Perincian Kegiatan dan Angka Kredit.
Miller, 1998, Organizational Behaviour, Performance and Productivity, First Edition, Random House Inc, New York.
Murphy, K., W. Balzer, M. Lockhart dan Eisenman, 1986, Effects of Previous Performance on Evaluation of Present Performance: Contrast Versus Assimilation Revisited, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71 Nomor 2.
Passy NH dan Taufik S, 1990, Manajemen Personalia, Edisi Ketiga, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 tahun 1999, tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 61 tahun 1999, tentang Penetapan Pendidikan Tinggi Negeri sebagai Badan Hukum.
Singarimbun, M dan Efendi, 1995, Metode Penelitian Survey, LP3ES, Jakarta.
Simamora, Henry, 1997, Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia, Edisi 2, BP STIE YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono, 1994, Metode Penelitian Administrasi, Edisi 4, CV. Alphabeta, Bandung.
Suhartini, 1994, “Analisis Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Peningkatan Kerja Dosen pada PTS di DIY”, Tesis Pasca Sarjana UNAIR-Surabaya.
Swasto, 1995, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya-Malang.
Widodo, 1996, “Analisis Pengaruh Variabel-variabel Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Dosen Fakultas Ekonomi”, Tesis Pasca Sarjana UNAIR-Surabaya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Sofyan Tsauri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









