Kesadaran Intensionalitas dalam Fenomenologi Edmund Husserl: Suatu Studi Epistemologi dalam Upaya Perbandingan dengan Metode Ilmiah
Intentionality Awareness in Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology: An Epistemological Study in Comparative Perspective with the Scientific Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/fenomena.v8i1.438Keywords:
intentionality, phenomenology, epistemology, intensionalitas, fenomenologi, epistemologiAbstract
The crisis of Western epistemology, dominated by positivism and psychologism, has reduced consciousness to mere empirical facts and created a subject-object dichotomy that fails to grasp the essence of knowledge. This study critically examines Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology, particularly his concept of intentionality, as a foundational epistemological alternative. The research aims to describe and analyze the historical emergence of Husserl’s thought, the originality of his concept of intentionality, and its implications for reconstructing epistemological foundations. Using a qualitative library research method with historical, hermeneutical, and deductive-inductive approaches, this study systematically analyzes Husserl’s primary texts. The findings reveal that intentionality—consciousness always being conscious of something—serves as the basic structure of knowledge, enabling a return to the things themselves (zu den Sachen selbst) through phenomenological reduction (epoche). This method overcomes the limitations of both rationalism and empiricism by establishing an a priori relationship between subject and object. The study concludes that Husserl’s intentionality offers a new paradigm for epistemology, recovering the substance of historical experience and reconstructing the essence and structure of knowledge, while recommending further application of this method in contemporary social sciences.
Krisis epistemologi Barat yang didominasi positivisme dan psikologisme telah mereduksi kesadaran menjadi fakta empiris semata serta menciptakan dikotomi subjek-objek yang gagal menangkap esensi pengetahuan. Penelitian ini mengkaji secara kritis fenomenologi Edmund Husserl, khususnya konsep intensionalitasnya, sebagai alternatif epistemologis yang fundamental. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis kemunculan historis pemikiran Husserl, orisinalitas intensionalitas, serta implikasinya bagi rekonstruksi fondasi epistemologi. Dengan metode penelitian kepustakaan kualitatif serta pendekatan historis, hermeneutik, dan deduktif-induktif, penelitian ini menganalisis secara sistematis teks-teks utama Husserl. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa intensionalitas—kesadaran selalu sadar akan sesuatu—merupakan struktur dasar pengetahuan yang memungkinkan kembalinya kepada hal itu sendiri (zu den Sachen selbst) melalui reduksi fenomenologis (epoche). Metode ini mengatasi keterbatasan rasionalisme dan empirisme dengan membangun relasi apriori antara subjek dan objek. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa intensionalitas Husserl menawarkan paradigma baru bagi epistemologi, memulihkan substansi pengalaman historis, serta merekonstruksi esensi dan struktur pengetahuan, dengan rekomendasi penerapan metode ini lebih lanjut dalam ilmu-ilmu sosial kontemporer.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. Amin. 2006. Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi, Pendekatan Integratif-interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bell, David. 1995. Husserl. New York: Routledge.
Bertens, K. 1989. Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Budianto, Irmayanti M. 2005. Realitas dan Objektivitas; Refleksi Kritis atas cara Kerja Ilmiah. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra.
Cairns, Dorion. 1976. Phenomenology (dalam Dagobert D. Runes). New Jersey: Littlefeild Adam & Co.
Cherinyakov, Alexei Giroevich. 2001. The Ontology of Time; Being and Time in The Philosophy of Aristotle, Husserl and Heidegger. Amsterdam: Vrije University.
Descartes, Rene. 2003. Diskursus Metode (terj. Ahmad Tariq Ma’ruf). Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Desilva, Antonio Barbara. 1982. The Phenomenology of Religion as Philosophical Probleme. Swiss: CWK Clerupihl.
Hadi, P. Hardono. 1994. Epistemologi Filsafat Pengetahuan Kenneth T. Gallagher. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Filsafat.
Hadiwiyono, Harun. 2005. San Sejarah Filsafat Barat 2. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hamersma, Herry. 1983. Tokoh-Tokoh Filsafat Barat Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Hamlyn. D.W. 1967. History of Philosophy (ed. Paul Edwards). The Ensiclopedy of Philosophy. Vol. 3.
Hardiman, F. Budi. 1991. Positivisme dan Hermeneutik, Suatu Usaha untuk Menyelematkan Subjek. Yogyakarta: Basis.
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. Logical Investigation. Vol. I. New York: The Humanities Press.
Kaelan. 2002. Filsafat Bahasa, Masalah dan Perkembangannya. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.
Kaelan. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.
Kattsof, Louis O. 2004. Pengantar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Kolakowski, Leszck. 1987. Husserl and the Search for Certainty. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2002. The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Peran Paradigma dalam Revolusi Sains (terj.). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Lauer, Quention. 1978. The Triumph of Subjectivity; an Introduction of Transcendental Phenomenology. New York: Fordham University Press.
Maritain, Jacques. 1959. The Degrees of Knowledge. New York: Scribner.
Ricouer, Paul. 1967. Husserl: an Analysis of His Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Runes, Dagobert D. 1971. Dictionary of Philosophy. New Jersey: Littlefield, Adam & co.
Stein, Edith. 2002. Finite and Eternal Being: an Attempt at an Ascent to the Meaning of Being. Washington: ICS Publication.
Suriasumantri, Jujun S. 1989. Ilmu dalam Perspektif. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1982. Traditional and Analytical Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Welton, Donn. 2003. The New Husserl; A Critical Reader. Indiana: University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Hafidz Hasyim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









